Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04196
Original file (BC 2013 04196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04196

	XXXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 14 Mar 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Due to ankle injury, he was unable to successfully obtain a minimum passing score on the cardio component of the contested FA.

In support of the appeal, the applicant submits 22 Mar 13 AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).

On 14 Mar 13, applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score (36.10) completing all four components.

AF Form 108, signed by PCM on 22 Mar 13, documents “Member did identify the medical condition, but no DLC was generated.  Follow up with PCM for DLC.  Recommend invalidation of FA in question.”

A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant should not have completed the FA due to injury.  Although the applicant’s injury was validated, there was no indication the commander invalidated the FA.



The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
19 Nov 13
88.25
Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio)
9 May 13
98.50
Excellent (Exempt from Cardio)
*14 Mar 13
36.10
Unsatisfactory (0 points from Cardio)
6 Sep 12
86.00
Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/SU)
19 Jan 12
83.67
Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/SU)

* Contested FA

In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, Paragraph b, “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional five duty days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided. Non-AGR and Traditional ARC Airmen will be required to retest the next date they are in appropriate military duty status and official FAs are being conducted. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.”

In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., “All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4).”

In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Attachment 4, Fitness Screening Questionnaire:  
“1. Have you experienced any of the symptoms/problems listed below and not been medically evaluated and cleared for unrestricted participation in a physical training program?
- Unexplained chest discomfort with or without exertion
- Unusual or unexplained shortness of breath
- Dizziness, fainting, or blackouts associated with exertion
- Other medical problems that may prevent you from safely participating in this test
     - Yes: Stop. Notify your UFPM and contact your PCP/MLO for evaluation/ recommendations (or for ARC, contact the MLO for Duty Limiting Conditions (DLC) documentation and referral to PCP).”
________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial and states, in part, that the AF Form 108 submitted did not have the unit commander’s signature at the bottom and he did not provide documentation of an invalidation memorandum from the unit commander in accordance with AFI guidance.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3. 	Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we believe he has met his burden of establishing the contested FA should be declared void. The FAAB disapproved the request, stating that while there was evidence to support his medical condition, a commander invalidation memorandum was not provided and AFPC/DPSIM concurred with the decision of the FAAB due to lack of supporting evidence.  While we note an invalidation memorandum from the unit commander was not submitted, we recognize the applicant’s medical provider indicated on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, that he did in fact have a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA.  Given his medical provider’s recommendation to invalidate the FA and since the evidence of record confirms the applicant was injured during the assessment, we find a totality of the evidence supports favorable consideration of this request. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessment, dated 14 Mar 2013 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04196 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Ms. XXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXXX, Member
	Ms. XXXXXXXXX, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Sep 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 4 Dec 13, w/atchs.	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Feb 14.




                                   XXXXXXXXX
                                   Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01802

    Original file (BC 2013 01802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Nov 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) 9 May 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) *25 Mar 13 33.33 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU) *12 Dec 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 28 Jun 12 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *19 Mar 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 2 Aug 11 84.70 Satisfactory 28 Apr 11 77.90 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01688

    Original file (BC 2013 01688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last six FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 3 Mar 14 85.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 9 Sep 13 96.38 Excellent (Exempt from PU/SU) 7 Mar 13 87.63 Satisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) 11 Sep 12 82.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) 30 Apr 12 82.00 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *31 Jan 12 72.63 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM3 (3 Jan 12),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03968

    Original file (BC 2013 03968.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 29 Aug 13 95.75 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio) *30 May 13 37.00 Unsatisfactory (0 Points for Cardio) 29 Nov 12 76.30 Satisfactory 5 May 12 84.90 Satisfactory 5 Jan 12 98.50 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, Paragraph b, “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury and provides...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04146

    Original file (BC 2013 04146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide any documentation describing the injury and why he could not pass the contested FAs. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.” In accordance with guidance at the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03162

    Original file (BC 2013 03162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Component Rating 11 Jun 13 Exempt Exempt Exempt all four categories *29 May 13 0.0 36.00”/0.00 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 29 Oct 12 85.50 32.50”/17.10 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 23 Apr 12 100.00 31.00”/20.00 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) 31 Oct 11 79.50 33.50”/15.90 Satisfactory (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03506

    Original file (BC 2013 03506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score (37.00) completing all four components. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01755

    Original file (BC 2013 01755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For non-AGR ARC, Airmen will be required to retest the next date they are in appropriate military duty status and official FAs are being conducted.” In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., “All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4).” In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2.1, “The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days (90 days for ARC), but...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04200

    Original file (BC 2013 04200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a pre-existing medical condition, which should have placed him on profile during the contested FA In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a Medical Determination letter, signed by his medical provider on 30 Apr 13, which states the applicant “had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test.” The applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04223

    Original file (BC 2013 04223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “The applicant's injury was not validated by the applicant's medical provider. Also, there was no indication the commander wanted to invalidate the Fitness Assessment.” In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM3 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04939

    Original file (BC 2013 04939.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Once her evaluation was complete, her medical provider indicated on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, that her medical condition prevented her from passing the Abdominal Circumference (AC) component of the test and precluded her from obtaining an overall passing score. DPSIM references AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program AFGM 5 (dated 3 Jan 13) stating that while the applicant had a documented medical condition that precluded her from passing, the...